Phishing Website Detection and Analysis using Machine Learning
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59890/ijist.v1i3.666Keywords:
Phishing Detection , Machine Learning, Cybersecurity, Website Security ,Online Threats , Support Vector Machines (SVM) , Logistic Regression , Random ForestAbstract
Phishing remains a pervasive cybersecurity threat, with attackers constantly contriving new ways to deceive users and concession sensitive information. This paper explores the operation of machine learning for the analysis and detection of phishing websites. The proposed methodology involves the collection of a different dataset comprising both known phishing and licit websites. Applicable features are uprooted from these websites, encompassing aspects similar as URL structure, content analysis, and behavioral patterns. After data preprocessing and feature selection, various machine learning algorithms are employed to train models for phishing detection. The model's performance is strictly estimated using standard criteria and cross-validation ways to insure robustness and delicacy. also, hyperparameter tuning and ensemble styles are employed to optimize discovery capabilities. Real- time deployment of the trained model into web browsers or dispatch guests is essential for timely protection against phishing attacks.
References
Dipayan Sinha, Dr. Minal Moharir, Prof. Anitha Sandeep, “Phishing Website URL Detection using Machine Learning,” International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 2495-2504, 2020 A. A. Reddy and B. N. Chatterji, "A new wavelet based logo-watermarking scheme," Pattern Recognition Letters, vol. 26, pp. 1019-1027, 2005.
Khonji, Mahmoud, Youssef Iraqi, and Andrew Jones. "Phishing detection: a literature survey." Communications Surveys & Tutorials, IEEE 15.4 (2013): 2091-2121.
R. Kiruthiga, D. Akila, “Phishing Websites Detection Using Machine Learning,” International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering (IJRTE), vol. 8, no. 2S11, pp. 11-114, September 2019
Anti Phishing Working Group. (2015. March.) APWG Phishing Activity Trend Report 2nd Quarter 2014. [Online]. Available: http://docs.apwg.org/reports/apwg_report_q2_2010.pdf
Sahingoz, O. K., Buber, E., Demir, O., & Diri, B. “Machine Learning-Based Phishing Detection from URLs,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 117, pp. 345-357, January 2019.
Alkhalil Z, Hewage C, Nawaf L, Khan I. Phishing attacks: A recent comprehensive study and a new anatomy. Front Comput Sci [Internet]. 2021;3. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcomp.2021.563060.
Jain AK, Gupta BB. A novel approach to protect against phishing attacks at client side using auto-updated white-list. EURASIP J Multimed Inf Secur [Internet]. 2016;2016(1). Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13635-016-0034-3.
Patil S, Dhage S. A methodical overview on phishing detection along with an organized way to construct an anti-phishing framework. In: 2019 5th International Conference on Advanced Computing & Communication Systems (ICACCS). IEEE; 2019. p. 588–93.
Geng G-G, Yan Z-W, Zeng Y, Jin X-B. RRPhish: Anti-phishing via mining brand resources request. In: 2018 IEEE International Conference on Consumer Electronics (ICCE). IEEE; 2018. p. 1–2.
Pratiwi ME, Lorosae TA, Wibowo FW. Phishing site detection analysis using artificial neural network. J Phys Conf Ser. 2018; 1140:012048.Sabri, M. F., & MacDonald, M. (2010). Savings Behavior and Financial Problems among College Students: The Role of Financial Literacy in Malaysia | Sabri | Cross-cultural Communication. Crosscultural Communication. https://doi.org/10.3968/j.ccc.1923670020100603.009
