Implementation of Debt Restructuring in Indonesia during the Enactment of Law Number 37 of 2004 concerning Bankruptcy and Postponement of Debt Payment Obligations
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59890/ijla.v2i2.2013Keywords:
Legal Implementation, Bankruptcy, Semi-Public Restructuring, Pre-Package Restructuring.Abstract
This research aims to determine and analyze the implementation of debt restructuring in Indonesia during the enactment of Law Number 37 of 2004 concerning Bankruptcy and Postponement of Debt Payment Obligations. The research method in this writing is normative legal research using a statutory approach, case approach, historical approach, comparative approach and conceptual approach. The types of legal materials in this research are primary legal materials and secondary legal materials. The technique for collecting legal materials is carried out by conducting literature studies. Then the legal material analysis technique is deductive using the deduction method. The results of the research in this paper are that the implementation of Law No. 37 of 2004 concerning Bankruptcy and Postponement of Payment Obligations is currently felt to not provide sufficient protection to debtors with good intentions.
References
Alberts. A., (1983) The Island, The University of Massachusetts Pres.
Amerika Serikat, U.S Bankruptcy Code.
Aryanto, Revalino, Andre, Kepailitan Sekedar Tambal Sulam?, artikel pada www.majalahtrust.com, diakses tanggal 7 November 2020.
Atmasasmita, Romli. (2012). Teori Hukum Integratif Rekonstruksi Terhadap Teori Hukum Pembangunan dan Teori Hukum Progresif, Cetakan Kedua. Yogyakarta: Genta Publishing.
Cruz, Peter De. (2019). Perbandingan Sistem Hukum Common Law, Civil Law, and Socialist Law. Jakarta: Penerbit Nusa Media.
Elyta, Ras G. (2018). Hukum Kepailitan Buku Kesatu Teori Kepailitan. Jakarta Timur: Sinar Grafika
Ferry Irawan F. (2017). “Keadilan Berdasarkan Pancasila Sebagai Dasar Filosofis Dan Ideologis Bangsa”. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum. Vol. 13 No. 25. Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Muhammadiyah Tulungagung.
Friedman, Lawrence M. (2001). American Law An Introduction Second Edition (Hukum Amerika Sebuah Pengantar), Jakarta: Tatanusa.
_______. (2002). American Law: An invaluable guide to the many faces of the law, and how it affects our daily our daily lives, New York. W.W. Norton & Company,
H. Deni Nuryadi. 2016. “Teori Hukum Progresif Dan Penerapannya Di Indonesia”. Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum. Vol. 4. No. 3
Kenneth M.Ayyotte, David A. Skeel Jr. (2013). “Bankrupty Law as a Liquidity Provider”. The University of Chicago Law Review. Volume 80.
Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. (2010). Penelitian Hukum. Surabaya: Universitas Air Langga.
Phillipe Foute. (2007). “Theoritical Foundatin For a Debitor Friendly Bankrupty Law In Favour of Creditors”. Europe Journal Law Econ. Vol 24.
Posner, Richard A. (1992). Economic Analysis of Law. (4th Ed). Boston Toronto. Little Brown & Company.
Rawls, Jhon. (2006). A Theory of Justice Teori Keadilan. Yogyakarta: Pusataka Pelajar.
Remy Sjahdeini, Sutan. (2010). Hukum Kepailitan Memahami Undang-Undang No. 37 Tahun 2004 tentang Kepailitan. Jakarta: Pustaka Utama Grafiti.
The Jackson, Scott Robert E. (1989). “On The Nature of Bankrupty: An Easy on Bankrupty Sharing and the Creditors Bargain”. Va Law Review, Vol 75.
Undang-Undang Dasar Tahun 1945.
Undang-Undang Nomor 37 Tahun 2004 tentang Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang
Undang-Undang Nomor 40 Tahun 2007 tentang Perseroan
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Eliska Desi Astuti, Suraji Suraji

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.