Teachers’ Instruction Simulation through Hots in English Writing

Authors

  • Ainul Asmah Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidenreng Rappang
  • Syamsu Tang Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidenreng Rappang
  • Lababa Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidenreng Rappang
  • Sam Hermansyah Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidenreng Rappang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59890/ijaamr.v2i9.2552

Keywords:

Higher Order Thinking Skills, Teacher Instruction, English Writing, Critical Thinking, Effective Learning

Abstract

This research aims to explore how teachers simulate instruction through Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) in English writing, with a focus on English teachers at SMP Negeri 3 Panca Rijang. Using a qualitative research method, the study investigates the strategies teachers use to stimulate students through HOTS in English classes and evaluates the impact and effectiveness of these strategies on students' writing abilities. The findings reveal that teachers encourage students to regularly use English in daily activities and expand their vocabulary through reading. These strategies effectively foster critical thinking, enabling students to analyze problems and approach English writing more systematically. The implementation of HOTS in teaching has a significant positive impact on students' learning outcomes, particularly in enhancing their analytical and creative thinking skills. The research concludes that the use of HOTS greatly improves the English learning process, contributing to the development of students' cognitive and problem-solving skills.

References

Anderson, N. J. (2004). Metacognitive reading strategies increase L2 performance. TESOL Quarterly, 38(1), 43-47.

Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Longmans, Green and Co.

Brookhart, S. M. (2010). How to assess higher-order thinking skills in your classroom. ASCD.

Brookhart, S. M. (2010). How to assess higher-order thinking skills in your classroom. ASCD.

Bruner, J. S. (1966). Toward a theory of instruction. Harvard University Press.

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications.

Dick, W., & Carey, L. (1996). The systematic design of instruction (4th ed.). Harper Collins.

Driscoll, M. P. (2005). Psychology of learning for instruction (3rd ed.). Pearson Education.

Flower, L., & Hayes, J. R. (1981). A cognitive process theory of writing. College Composition and Communication, 32(4), 365-387.

Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. Basic Books.

Gerlach, V. S., & Ely, D. P. (1980). Teaching and media: A systematic approach. Prentice Hall.

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.

Piaget, J. (1972). The psychology of the child. Basic Books.

Sternberg, R. J. (1985). Beyond IQ: A triarchic theory of human intelligence. Cambridge University Press.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

Downloads

Published

2024-09-30

How to Cite

Ainul Asmah, Syamsu Tang, Lababa, & Sam Hermansyah. (2024). Teachers’ Instruction Simulation through Hots in English Writing. International Journal of Applied and Advanced Multidisciplinary Research, 2(9), 709–718. https://doi.org/10.59890/ijaamr.v2i9.2552