Arms Control as a Climate Mitigation Strategy: Examining the Nexus
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59890/ijaamr.v2i1.971Keywords:
Arms Control, Climate Change Mitigation, Geopolitical Context, Environmental Impact, Global GovernanceAbstract
Global ecosystems are seriously threatened by climate change, which calls for creative mitigation strategies. In an effort to fill a knowledge vacuum on the subject, this paper investigates the relationship between arms control and climate change mitigation. Specifically, it looks at how arms control policies may boost climate resilience. The research utilizes a thorough literature assessment, incorporating past viewpoints on arms control and current approaches to mitigating climate change. Approach-wise, a qualitative study is carried out to evaluate the empirical and theoretical relationship between weapons control policies and climate change mitigation. Important conclusions show that some weapons control programs can favorably impact climatic outcomes, offering a little-considered option for tackling environmental and security issues. The policy implications highlight the necessity of a more integrated approach to environmental governance and security, and the creation of focused, interdisciplinary policies is emphasized in the recommendations for future research. This study adds to the current conversation on mitigating climate change by providing a fresh viewpoint that supports the double advantages of successful arms control policies in promoting environmental sustainability on a worldwide scale.
References
Allcott, H., & Greenstone, M. (2012). Is there an energy efficiency gap? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 26(1), 3-28.
Arbatov, A. (2011). De-alerting in Perspective. International Security, 35(4), 186-194.
Biermann, F., et al. (2018). Transforming global governance for the Anthropocene: A high-level panel on global sustainability. Global Environmental Change, 52, 1-10.
Boyd, D. R. (2019). Military activities and the environment: A review of the evidence. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 75, 22-33.
Boot-Handford, M. E., et al. (2014). Carbon capture and storage update. Energy & Environmental Science, 7(5), 130-189.
Bromley, M. (2014). The arms trade treaty and the regulation of the international conventional arms trade. Journal of Conflict and Security Law, 19(1), 87-117.
Bullard, R. D. (2008). Environmental justice in the 21st century: Race still matters. Phylon, 45(1/2), 151-171.
Creutzig, F., et al. (2017). The underestimated potential of solar energy to mitigate climate change. Nature Energy, 2(9), 17140.
Fargione, J., et al. (2018). Natural climate solutions for the United States. Science Advances, 4(11), eaat1869.
Freedman, L. (2015). The Future of War: A History. Public Affairs.
Goulder, L. H. (2013). Climate change policy's interactions with the tax system. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 2013(1), 309-328.
Henig, R. (1984). The League of Nations. The Journal of Modern History, 56(2), 289-307.
IPCC. (2014). Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (2018). Global Warming of 1.5°C. Retrieved from https://www.ipcc.ch/sr15/
Kennedy, P. M. (1980). The Rise and Fall of the Great Powers: Economic Change and Military Conflict from 1500 to 2000. Vintage Books.
Lutz, D. S. (2011). Ancient Greek Warfare: Tactics, Weaponry, and Ideology in Archaic and Classical Times. University of California Press.
Matlin, W. (2012). Disarmament. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Matlock, J. (2004). Reagan and Gorbachev: How the Cold War Ended. Random House.
Osiander, A. (1998). Sovereignty, International Relations, and the Westphalian Myth. International Organization, 51(4), 623-658.
Sagan, S. D. (2011). The Limits of Safety: Organizations, Accidents, and Nuclear Weapons. Princeton University Press.
Smith, P. (2007). Deterrence theory. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Smith, P., et al. (2014). Agriculture, forestry and other land use (AFOLU). In Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Retrieved from https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/2018/02/ipcc_wg3_ar5_chapter11.pdf
Stavins, R. N. (2019). The Paris Agreement and climate change negotiations. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 13(1), 1-23.
WCED. (1987). Our Common Future. World Commission on Environment and Development.
Whitmarsh, L. (2009). Behavioural responses to climate change: Asymmetry of intentions and impacts. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29(1), 13-23.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Munir Ahmad, Muhammad Karim, Zahid Hussain, Alyas Ali Chaichi

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.



