Factor Structure and Measurement Invariance of the Teacher Reported Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaires for Elementary School Students in the United States and China

Authors

  • Ruiqin Gao University of South Carolina
  • Jin Liu University of South Carolina
  • Ruyi Ding University of South Carolina
  • Suzy Hardie University of South Carolina
  • Wei He University of South Carolina

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59890/ijaer.v2i2.1467

Keywords:

Factor Structure, Cross-Culture, Measurement Invariance, SDQ, Validity

Abstract

The current study aimed to explore the factor structure and the measurement invariance of the

teacher-reported Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) across cultures (the United States and China). We used a sample of elementary school students in the U.S. (N=639) and China (N=666). Confirmatory factor analysis results identified the underlying 3-factor structure of the SDQ for each group sample (i.e., Internalizing Problems, Externalizing Problems, and Prosocial Behavior). A Multiple-group Confirmatory Factor Analysis indicated that SDQ showed full configural, metric, scalar, and residual invariance across the U.S. and China within the elementary school setting. The present study’s findings contributed to the literature by adding additional validity evidence of teacher-reported SDQ, supporting the feasibility of cross-cultural comparisons of elementary school children’s mental health measured by teacher-reported SDQ.

 

References

References

Ab Hamid, M. R., Sami, W., & Sidek, M. M. (2017, September). Discriminant validity

assessment: Use of Fornell & Larcker criterion versus HTMT criterion. In Journal of

Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 890, No. 1, p. 012163). IOP Publishing.

Bibou-Nakou, I., Markos, A., Padeliadu, S., Chatzilampou, P., & Ververidou, S. (2019). Multi-

informant evaluation of students' psychosocial status through SDQ in a national Greek

sample. Children and Youth Services Review, 96, 47-54.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2018.11.022

Brown, T. A. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. Guilford publications.

Campbell, S. B. (2002). Behavior problems in preschool children: Clinical and developmental

issues. New York: Guilford Press.

Chen, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement

Invariance. Structural equation modeling: a multidisciplinary journal, 14(3), 464-504.

https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701301834

Chiorri, C., Hall, J., Casely-Hayford, J., & Malmberg, L. E. (2016). Evaluating measurement

invariance between parents using the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire

(SDQ). Assessment, 23(1), 63-74. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191114568301

Costello, A. B., & Osborne, J. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four

recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical assessment,

research, and evaluation, 10(1), 7.

Davidov, E. (2011). Nationalism and constructive patriotism: A longitudinal test of

comparability in 22 countries with the ISSP. International Journal of Public Opinion

Research, 23(1), 88-103. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edq031

Dever, B. V., Dowdy, E., Raines, T. C., & Carnazzo, K. (2015). Stability and change of

behavioral and emotional screening scores. Psychology in the Schools, 52(6), 618-629.

https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.21825

Dickey, W. C., & Blumberg, S. J. (2004). Revisiting the factor structure of the strengths and

difficulties questionnaire: United States, 2001. Journal of the American Academy of

Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 43(9), 1159-1167.

https://doi.org/10.1097/01.chi.0000132808.36708.a9

Dimitrov, D. M. (2010). Testing for factorial invariance in the context of construct

validation. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 43(2), 121-

https://doi.org/10.1177/0748175610373459

Di Riso, D., Salcuni, S., Chessa, D., Raudino, A., Lis, A., & Altoè, G. (2010). The Strengths and

Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ). Early evidence of its reliability and validity in a

community sample of Italian children. Personality and Individual Differences, 49(6),

-575. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.05.005

Duinhof, E. L., Lek, K. M., De Looze, M. E., Cosma, A., Mazur, J., Gobina, I., ... & Stevens, G.

W. J. M. (2020). Revising the self-report strengths and difficulties questionnaire for cross-country comparisons of adolescent mental health problems: the SDQ-R. Epidemiology and psychiatricsciences,29.

https://doi.org/10.1017/s2045796019000246

Eisenberg, N., Fabes, R. A., & Spinrad, T. L. (2006). Handbook of child psychology (Vol. 3, pp.

-718). Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons.

Essau, C. A., Olaya, B., Anastassiou‐Hadjicharalambous, X., Pauli, G., Gilvarry, C., Bray, D., ...

& Ollendick, T. H. (2012). Psychometric properties of the Strength and Difficulties

Questionnaire from five European countries. International Journal of Methods in

Psychiatric Research, 21(3), 232-245. https://doi.org/10.1002/mpr.1364

Finney, S. J., & Davis, S. L. (2003). Examining the invariance of the achievement goal

questionnaire across gender. In annual meeting of the American Educational Research

Association, Chicago, IL.

Finney, S., & DiStefano, C. (2013). Dealing with nonnormality and categorical data in structural

equation modeling. A second course in structural equation modeling. Greenwich, CT:

Information Age.

Gao, X., Shi, W., Zhai, Y., He, L., & Shi, X. (2013). Results of the parent-rated strengths and

difficulties questionnaire in 22,108 primary school students from 8 provinces of China. Shanghai Archives of Psychiatry, 25(6), 364.

Gomez, R., & Stavropoulos, V. (2020). Malaysian parent ratings of the strengths

and difficulties questionnaire: factor structure and measurement invariance

across language versions, gender, informants, and race. Assessment, 27(8),

-1984. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191118787284

Goodman, R. (1997). The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: a research note. Journal of

child psychology and psychiatry, 38(5), 581-586.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1997.tb01545.x

Goodman, R. (2001). Psychometric properties of the strengths and difficulties

questionnaire. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent

Psychiatry, 40(11), 1337-1345.

Goodman, A., & Goodman, R. (2009). Strengths and difficulties questionnaire as a dimensional

measure of child mental health. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent

Psychiatry, 48(4), 400-403. https://doi.org/10.1097/chi.0b013e3181985068

Goodman, A., Heiervang, E., Fleitlich-Bilyk, B., Alyahri, A., Patel, V., Mullick, M. S., ... &

Goodman, R. (2012). Cross-national differences in questionnaires do not necessarily reflect comparable differences in disorder prevalence. Social psychiatry and psychiatric

epidemiology, 47(8), 1321-1331. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-011-0440-2

Goodman, A., Joyce, R., & Smith, J. P. (2011). The long shadow cast by childhood physical and

mental problems on adult life. Proceedings of the National Academy of

Sciences, 108(15), 6032-6037. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1016970108

Goodman, A., Lamping, D. L., & Ploubidis, G. B. (2010). When to use broader internalising and

externalising subscales instead of the hypothesised five subscales on the Strengths and

Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ): data from British parents, teachers and

children. Journal of abnormal child psychology, 38(8), 1179-1191.

Goodman, R., Meltzer, H., & Bailey, V. (1998). The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: A

pilot study on the validity of the self-report version. European child & adolescent

psychiatry, 7(3), 125-130. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-010-9434-x

Greiff, S., & Heene, M. (2017). Why psychological assessment needs to start worrying about

model fit. European Journal of Psychological Assessment. 33(5), 313–317.

https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000450

Guo, M., Morawska, A., & Filus, A. (2018). Initial validation of the parent-report Child

Adjustment and Parent Efficacy Scale (CAPES) in a Chinese cultural

context. Assessment, 25(8), 1056-1073. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191116681493

Hair Jr, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2021). A primer on partial least

squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage publications.

He, J. P., Burstein, M., Schmitz, A., & Merikangas, K. R. (2013). The Strengths and Difficulties

Questionnaire (SDQ): the factor structure and scale validation in US adolescents. Journal

of abnormal child psychology, 41(4), 583-595.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-012-9696-6

Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis:

Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A

Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118

Jung, E., & Yoon, M. (2016). Comparisons of three empirical methods for partial factorial

invariance: Forward, backward, and factor-ratio tests. Structural Equation Modeling: A

Multidisciplinary Journal, 23(4), 567-584.

https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2015.1138092

Kersten, P., Czuba, K., McPherson, K., Dudley, M., Elder, H., Tauroa, R., & Vandal, A. (2016).

A systematic review of evidence for the psychometric properties of the Strengths and

Difficulties Questionnaire. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 40(1), 64-

https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025415570647

Kettler, R. J., Glover, T. A., Albers, C. A., & Feeney‐Kettler, K. A. (2014). An introduction to

universal screening in educational settings. In R. J. Kettler, T. A. Glover, C. A. Albers, &

K. A. Feeney‐Kettler (Eds.), Universal screening in educational settings: Evidence‐based

decision making for schools (pp. 3–16). Washington, DC: American Psychological

Association.

Klasen, H., Woerner, W., Rothenberger, A., & Goodman, R. (2003). German version of the

Strength and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ-German)--overview and evaluation of

initial validation and normative results. Praxis der Kinderpsychologie und

Kinderpsychiatrie, 52(7), 491-502.

Konold, T. R., Walthall, J. C., & Pianta, R. C. (2004). The behavior of child behavior ratings:

Measurement structure of the Child Behavior Checklist across time, informants, and child

gender. Behavioral Disorders, 29(4), 372-383.

https://doi.org/10.1177/019874290402900405

Liang, Lijuan, Juan Yang, and Shuqiao Yao. Measurement equivalence of the SDQ in Chinese

adolescents: a horizontal and longitudinal perspective. Journal of affective disorders 257

(2019): 439-444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2019.06.049

Liu, S. K., Chien, Y. L., Shang, C. Y., Lin, C. H., Liu, Y. C., & Gau, S. S. F. (2013).

Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of Strength and Difficulties

Questionnaire. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 54(6), 720-730.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comppsych.2013.01.002

MacCallum, R. C., Roznowski, M., & Necowitz, L. B. (1992). Model modifications in

covariance structure analysis: the problem of capitalization on chance. Psychological

bulletin, 111(3), 490. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.111.3.490

Malti, T., & Dys, S. P. (2018). From being nice to being kind: Development of prosocial

behaviors. Current Opinion in Psychology, 20, 45-49.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.07.036

McNeish, D., An, J., & Hancock, G. R. (2018). The thorny relation between measurement

quality and fit index cutoffs in latent variable models. Journal of personality

assessment, 100(1), 43-52. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2017.1281286

Mellor, D., Cheng, W., McCabe, M., Ling, M., Liu, Y., Zhao, Z., ... & Xu, Y. (2016). The use of

the SDQ with Chinese adolescents in the clinical context. Psychiatry research, 246, 520-

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2016.10.034

Mieloo, C. L., Bevaart, F., Donker, M. C., van Oort, F. V., Raat, H., & Jansen, W. (2014).

Validation of the SDQ in a multi-ethnic population of young children. The European

Journal of Public Health, 24(1), 26-32. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckt100

Murray, A. L., Speyer, L. G., Hall, H. A., Valdebenito, S., & Hughes, C. (2021). Teacher versus

parent informant measurement invariance of the Strengths and Difficulties

Questionnaire. Journal of pediatric psychology, 46(10), 1249-1257.

https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/u89rb

Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. (2019). Mplus. The comprehensive modelling program for applied

researchers: user’s guide, 5.

Niclasen, J., Skovgaard, A. M., Andersen, A. M. N., Sømhovd, M. J., & Obel, C. (2013). A

confirmatory approach to examining the factor structure of the Strengths and Difficulties

Questionnaire (SDQ): a large scale cohort study. Journal of abnormal child

psychology, 41, 355-365. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-012-9683-y

Obel, C., Heiervang, E., Rodriguez, A., Heyerdahl, S., Smedje, H., Sourander, A., ... & Olsen, J.

(2004). The strengths and difficulties questionnaire in the Nordic countries. European

child & adolescent psychiatry, 13(2), ii32-ii39.

Padilla‐Walker, L. M., & Christensen, K. J. (2011). Empathy and self‐regulation as mediators

between parenting and adolescents' prosocial behavior toward strangers, friends, and

family. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 21(3), 545-551.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7795.2010.00695.x

Pagliaccio, D., Luby, J., Gaffrey, M., Belden, A., Botteron, K., Gotlib, I. H., & Barch, D. M.

(2012). Anomalous functional brain activation following negative mood induction in

children with pre-school onset major depression. Developmental Cognitive

Neuroscience, 2(2), 256-267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2011.11.008

Raykov, T., & DiStefano, C. (2021). Design Effect in Multilevel Settings: A Commentary on a

Latent Variable Modeling Procedure for Its Evaluation. Educational and Psychological

Measurement, 00131644211019447. https://doi.org/10.1177/00131644211019447

Raykov, T., & Marcoulides, G. A. (2012). A first course in structural equation modeling.

Routledge.

Rogge, J., Koglin, U., & Petermann, F. (2018). Do they rate in the same way? Testing of

measurement invariance across parent and teacher SDQ ratings. European Journal of

Psychological Assessment, 34(2), 69. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000445

Schreiber, J. B., Nora, A., Stage, F. K., Barlow, E. A., & King, J. (2006). Reporting structural

equation modeling and confirmatory factor analysis results: A review. The Journal of

educational research, 99(6), 323-338. https://doi.org/10.3200/joer.99.6.323-338

SDQ: Information for researchers and professionals about the strengths & difficulties questionnaires. n.d., https://www.sdqin fo.com/.

Sebanc, A. M. (2003). The friendship features of preschool children: Links with prosocial

behavior and aggression. Social development, 12(2), 249-268.

https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9507.00232

Shonkoff, J. P., Garner, A. S., Siegel, B. S., Dobbins, M. I., Earls, M. F., McGuinn, L., ... &

Committee on Early Childhood, Adoption, and Dependent Care. (2012). The lifelong

effects of early childhood adversity and toxic stress. Pediatrics, 129(1), e232-e246.

https://doi.org/10.1542/9781610023658-part02-the_lifelong

Stevanovic, D., Urbán, R., Atilola, O., Vostanis, P., Balhara, Y. S., Avicenna, M., ... & Petrov, P.

(2015). Does the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire–self report yield invariant

measurements across different nations? Data from the International Child Mental Health

Study Group. Epidemiology and psychiatric sciences, 24(4), 323-334.

https://doi.org/10.1017/s2045796014000201

Toh, T. H., Chow, S. J., Ting, T. H., & Sewell, J. (2008). Chinese translation of strengths and

difficulties questionnaire requires urgent review before field trials for validity and

reliability. Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health, 2(1), 1-4.

https://doi.org/10.1186/1753-2000-2-23

Van Leeuwen, K., Meerschaert, T., Bosmans, G., De Medts, L., & Braet, C. (2006). The

Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire in a community sample of young children in

Flanders. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 22(3), 189-197.

https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759.22.3.189

Van Widenfelt, B. M., Goedhart, A. W., Treffers, P. D., & Goodman, R. (2003). Dutch version

of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ). European child & adolescent

psychiatry, 12(6), 281-289. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-003-0341-3

Wittek, R., & Bekkers, R. H. F. P. (2015). The sociology of prosocial behavior and altruism.

In International Encyclopedia of Social and Behavioral Sciences (pp. 579-583). Elsevier.

https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-08-097086-8.32158-4

Worm-Smeitink, M., Gielissen, M., Bloot, L., Van Laarhoven, H. W. M., Van Engelen, B. G.

M., Van Riel, P., ... & Knoop, H. (2017). The assessment of fatigue: Psychometric

qualities and norms for the Checklist individual strength. Journal of psychosomatic

research, 98, 40-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2017.05.007

Downloads

Published

2024-05-31

How to Cite

Gao, R., Liu, J., Ding, R., Hardie, S., & He, W. (2024). Factor Structure and Measurement Invariance of the Teacher Reported Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaires for Elementary School Students in the United States and China. International Journal of Applied Educational Research (IJAER), 2(2), 137–156. https://doi.org/10.59890/ijaer.v2i2.1467

Issue

Section

Articles