What Mathematical Knowledge is Needed for Teaching Mathematics ?

Authors

  • Torang Siregar UIN Syekh Ali Hasan Ahmad Addary Padangsidimpuan
  • Lisda Lubis UIN Syekh Ali Hasan Ahmad Addary Padangsidimpuan
  • Samsiderni Siregar UIN Syekh Ali Hasan Ahmad Addary Padangsidimpuan
  • Rafidah Afrah Zuhair UIN Syekh Ali Hasan Ahmad Addary Padangsidimpuan
  • Defiana Lisa UIN Syekh Ali Hasan Ahmad Addary Padangsidimpuan
  • Siti Aisyah UIN Syekh Ali Hasan Ahmad Addary Padangsidimpuan
  • Suci Rahmadany UIN Syekh Ali Hasan Ahmad Addary Padangsidimpuan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59890/ijaer.v1i1.391

Keywords:

Mathematical Knowledge, Needed, Teaching Mathematics

Abstract

Abstract

Concern about Padangsidimpuan City students’ mathematics achievement has grown; evidence makes plain that the teaching and learning of mathematics in the Padangsidimpuan City needs improvement. This is not the first time that this country has turned its worried attention to mathematics education. However, past efforts have consisted of effort more than effect. We are not likely to succeed this time, either, without taking into account what has led to the disappointing outcomes of past efforts and examining factors that contribute to success in other countries. Consider what research and experience consistently reveal: Although the typical methods of improving instructional quality have been to develop curriculum, and especially in the last decade to articulate standards for what should students should learn, little improvement is possible without direct attention to the practice of teaching. No curriculum teaches it self, and standards do not operate independently of professionals’ interpretations of them. The efforts of the past decade have shown that good instruction can make a difference, and that teachers can learn from and for their work with curriculum materials. But clearer now is that using curriculum effectively and working responsibly with standards depend on understanding the subject matter. How teachers know mathematics is central to their capacity to use instructional materials wisely, to assess students’ progress, and to make sound judgments about presentation, emphasis, and sequencing. The last decade has made that plain. We cannot afford to keep re-learning that improvement of students’ learning depends on skillful teaching, and that skillful teaching depends on capable teachers and what they know and can do.

References

These remarks were prepared for the Secretary’s Summit on Mathematics, Padangsidimpuan City Department of Education, September 26, 2023; Padangsidimpuan. Questions and comments may be addressed to the author at torangsir@uinsyahada.ac.id or School of Education, Statet Islamic University of Syekh Ali Hasan Ahmad Addary Padangsidimpuan, North Sumatera, Indonesia.

The ideas discussed here have been influenced by my ongoing research and teaching with Lisda Lubis, Samsiderni Siregar, Suci Rahmadany Harahap, Rafidah Afrah Zuhair, Defiana Lisa, Siti Aisyah and the other members of the Mathematics Teaching and Learning to Teach group at the Statet Islamic University of Syahada Padangsidimpuan.

National Mathematics Advisory Panel. (2008) Foundations for suc- cess: The final report of the National Mathematics Advisory Panel. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.

Niess, M. L. (2005). Preparing teachers to teach science and mathe- matics with technology: Developing a technology pedagogical content knowledge. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21, 509-523. Noss, R., & Hoyles, C. (1996). The visibility of meanings: Designing for understanding the mathematics of banking. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 1(1), 3-31.

Phelps, G. (2008). Just knowing how to read isn’t enough! What teachers need to know about the content of reading. Manuscript submitted for publication.

Phelps, G., & Schilling, S. G. (2004). Developing measures of con- tent knowledge for teaching reading. Elementary School Journal, 105(1), 31-48.

Philipp, R. A., Cabral, C., & Schappelle, B. P. (2005). IMAP CD- ROM: Integrating mathematics and pedagogy to illustrate children’s reasoning [Computer software]. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.

Rovegno, I., Chen, W., & Todorovich, J. (2003). Accomplished teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge of teaching dribbling to third grade children. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 22, 426-449.

Schilling, S. G. (in press). The role of psychometric modeling in test validation for the MKT measures: An application of multidimen- sional item response theory. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives.

Schwab, J. J. (1978). Education and the structure of the disciplines. In I. Westbury & N. Wilkof (Eds.), Science, curriculum, and lib- eral education (pp. 167-183). Chicago: University of Chicago. (Original work published 1961)

Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14.

Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57, 1-22.

Smith, E. L., & Anderson, C. W. (1984). Plants as producers: A case study of elementary science teaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 21(7), 685-698.

Stylianides, A. J., & Ball, D. L. (2004, April). Studying the mathe- matical knowledge needed for teaching: The case of teachers’ knowledge of reasoning and proof. Paper prepared for the 2004 Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.

Thames, M. H. (2008). A study of practice-based approaches for determining the mathematics that (K-8) teachers need to know. Unpublished manuscript.

Wilson, S., Shulman, L., & Richert, A. (1987). “150 different ways of knowing”: Representations of knowledge in teaching. In J. Calderhead (Ed.), Exploring teachers’ thinking (pp. 104-123). Eastbourne, UK: Cassell.

Wilson, S. M. (1988). Understanding historical understanding: Subject matter knowledge and the teaching of American history. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA.

Wilson, S. M., & Wineburg, S. S. (1988). Peering at history through different lenses: The role of disciplinary perspectives in teaching history. Teachers College Record, 89(4), 525-539.

Wineburg, S. (1990). Historical problem-solving: A study of the cog- nitive processes used in the evaluation of documentary evidence. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA.

Downloads

Published

2023-10-16

How to Cite

Torang Siregar, Lubis, L., Siregar, S., Zuhair, R. A., Lisa, D., Aisyah, S., & Rahmadany, S. (2023). What Mathematical Knowledge is Needed for Teaching Mathematics ?. International Journal of Applied Educational Research (IJAER), 1(1), 41–54. https://doi.org/10.59890/ijaer.v1i1.391