Evaluation of Teacher Empowerment Education Program 4th Batch in South Tanggerang Using the Krikpatrick Model
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59890/ijasr.v2i1.1150Keywords:
Evaluation, Kirkpatrick, Teacher MoverAbstract
The Teacher Empowerment Program (PPGP) is a professional development initiative through education, training, and mentoring that focuses on instructional leadership to promote holistic growth and active, proactive participation of students. The program aims to actively develop educators to implement student-centered learning. This qualitative research employs a narrative approach. The research results show positive behavioral changes in teacher mover after completing PPGP, notably impacting the improvement of classroom learning quality and the cultivation of a learning culture among teachers within the school ecosystem. Although some schools have not fully optimized the growth of a learning culture among their teachers, they are moving in the right direction. Challenges and obstacles are inherent in transformation efforts, reinforcing the appropriateness of the Ministry of Education and Culture's decision to appoint Teacher Empowerment Program participants as school leaders. This move strengthens the force for change and minimizes resistance to or rejection of change.
References
Adjadan, S. (2015). Evaluasi Program Pendidikan dan Pelatihan Calon Kepala Sekolah (Studi Evaluatif Pascadiklat di LPMP Provinsi Maluku Utara). Jurnal Evaluasi Pendidikan Vol. 17 No. 3.
Alliger GM and Janak EA (1989). Kirkpatrick's levels of training criteria: thirty years later”. Personnel Psychology Vol. 42 No. 2.
Ambiyar & Muharika. D. (2019). Metodologi Penelitian Evaluasi Program. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Ananda, R. & Rafida, T. (2017). Pengantar Evaluasi Program Pendidikan. Medan: Perdana Publishing.
Anh, V. T. K. (2018). Evaluation Models in Educational Program: Strenghts and Weaknesses. VNU Journal of Foreign Studies Vol. 34 No. 2.
Arikunto, S. & Jabar, C. S. A. (2009). Evaluasi Program Pendidikan: Pedoman Teoretis Praktis bagi Mahasiswa dan Praktisi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Arikunto, S. (2005). Evaluasi Program Pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Arikunto, S. (2004). Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Bates, R. (2004). A Critical Analysis of Evaluation Practice: The Kirkpatrick Model and The Principle of Beneficence, Evaluation and Program Planning. Vol. 27 No. 3.
Christian P. Umboh, Florence D.H. Lengkong, Novva N. Plangiten (2023). Efektifitas Program Guru Penggerak Kementerian Pendidikan Kebudayaan Riset dan Tekonologi di SMP Negeri 3 Tumpaan. Jurnal Administrasi Publik Vol.9 No.2.
Creswell, John W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches Fourth Edition. Sage Publication.
Daga, A. (2021). Makna Merdeka Belajar dan Penguatan Peran Guru di Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Education,Vol. 7 No. 3.
Djaali dan Muljono (2004). Pengukuran Dalam Bidang Pendidikan. Jakarta: Program Pascasarjana UNJ.
Fitzpatrick, J. L., James, R. S. & Blaine, R. W. (2004). Program Evaluation Alternative Approaches and Practical Guidelines. Boston: Pearson Education Inc.
Griffin, P., dan Nix, P. (1991). Educational Assessment and Reporting. Sydney: Harcout Brace Javanovich Publisher.
Hendra Mahill dan Matius Bangun (2022), Analisis Program Guru Penggerak Sebagai Agen Transformasi Dalam Sistem Pendidikan di Kota Subulussalam Provinsi Aceh. Jurnal Prointegrita Vol. 6 No.3.
Hendri, N. (2020). MERDEKA BELAJAR; ANTARA RETORIKA DAN APLIKASI. E-Tech Vol. 8 No.1.
James Bell Associates. (2007). Evaluation brief: Developing a logic model. Arlington, VA. August 2007.
Kasali, R. (2007). Change. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka.
Kellogg. W.K. Foundation. (2004). Using Logic Models to Bring Planning, Evaluation, and Action. Michigan: WK Kellogg Foundation. http://www.wkkf.org
Kemendikbudristek (2021). Panduan Pengembangan Projek Penguatan Profil Pelajar Pancasila. Jakarta: Badan Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan dan Perbukuan Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset dan Teknologi.
Keputusan Direktorat Jenderal Guru dan Tenaga Kependidikan Kemendikbudristek No. 1302/B/PD.00.02/2022 tentang Pedoman Pendidikan Guru Penggerak.
Kholisdinuka, A. (2020). “Lebih Dari Guru Biasa, Guru Penggerak Kemendikbud Bakal Punya Tugas Ini.” 11 November 2020. https://news.detik.com.
Kirkpatrick, D., L. & Kirkpatrick J. D. (2006). Evaluating Training Program The Four Levels. San Fransisco: Berret-Kohler Publisher Inc.
Kirkpatrick, D. L. & Kirkpatrick, J. D. (2005). Transferring Learning to Behavior: Using the Four Levels to Improve Performance. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
Kirkpatrick D. L. (1996). Great ideas revisited: revisiting Kirkpatrick's four-level model. Training and Development Vol. 50 No. 1.
Kirkpatrick, D. L. (1959). Techniques for Evaluation Training Programs. Journal of the American Society of Training Directors Vol 13.
Kotter, J. dan L. A. S. (2008). Choosing Strtategies for Change. Harvard Business Review.
Krueger, Richard A. 1988. FOCUS GROUPS: A Practical Guide for Applied Research. SAGE Publications. California.
Leonora Layola Oriondo and Eleanor M. Dallo Antonio (1998). Evaluating Educational Outcomes. Manila: Rex Book Store.
Lewin, K. (1951). Field Theory and Social Science. Harper and Row.
Locke, L.E., Spirduso. W.W. & Silverman. SJ. (2013). Proposals that work: A Guide for planning dissertasions and grant proposals (edisi ke-6). Thousand Oaks. CA: Sage.
Madaus, G.F., Scriven, M.S., & Stufflebeam, D.L. (1993). Evaluation models, viewpoints on educational and human services evaluation. Boston: Kluwer-Nijhoff Publishing.
Mangkunegara, Anwar Prabu (2003). Perencanaan dan Pengembangan Sumber Daya Manusia. Bandung: Refika Dharma.
Maria Marta Manao, Oslen Parulian Sijabat, Asima Rohana Situmorang, Agusmanto Hutauruk, Simon Panjaitan (2022). Mengatur Kualitas Guru Melalui Program Guru Penggerak. Journal of Educational Learning and Innovation Vol. 2 No. 1.
Martin Tassmer (1995). Planning and Conductioning Formatif Evaluation. London: Kogan Page.
McLaughlin, J. A., and Jordan, G. B. (1999). Logic models: A tool for telling your programs Performance Story. Evaluation and Program Planning.
McShane, L. S., & Glinow, M. A. Von. (2008). Organizational Behavior: Emerging and Realities for The Workplace Revolution. McGraw-Hills.
Merriam, S.B. (1998). Qualitative Research and case study applications in education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Musa, S. (2005). Evaluasi Program Pembelajaran dan Pemberdayaan Masyarakat. Bandung: Y-Pin Indonesia.
Mustaghfiroh, S. (2020). Konsep “Merdeka Belajar” Perspektif Aliran Progresivisme John Dewey. Jurnal Studi Guru Dan Pembelajaran, Vol.3 No. 1.
Nadiem, A. M. (2020). Pemaparan program guru dalam peluncuran merdeka belajar episode 5 tentang “Guru Penggerak.” https://youtu.be/X6vP4AkEsLM.
Neneng Lina (2013). Perencanaan Pendidikan. Jakarta: Kalam Mulia.
Notoatmodjo, Soekidjo (2003). Pengembangan Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Nur Sodik, Fitri Oviyanti, Muhammad Win Afgani (2021). Strategi Meningkatkan Kinerja Guru Pendidikan Agama Islam Melalui Program Guru Penggerak. AL-WIJDÁN: Journal of Islamic Education Studies Vol. 6 No.2.Permendikbudristek No. 26 Tahun 2022 tentang Pendidikan Guru Penggerak.
Phillips, J. (1991). Handbook of training evaluation and measurement methods 2nd ed. Houston: Gulf Publishing Company.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Reni Setiati, Rugaiyah, Suryadi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
