Fatherless Family Communication in Patriarchal Culture

Inez Septiya Rosalinda; Teguh Priyo Sadono; Bambang Sigit Pramono

doi:10.59890/ijsss.v2i3.2035

Authors

Inez Septiya Rosalinda Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya
Teguh Priyo Sadono Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya
Bambang Sigit Pramono Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59890/ijsss.v2i3.2035

Abstract

This fatherless phenomenon is a phenomenon that is currently occurring in Indonesia, especially Lamongan, where there is still a strong patriarchal culture. Where the existence of a patriarchal culture can give rise to a negative stigma in society. Therefore, researchers want to examine the public stigma towards fatherless families in family communication and the dynamics of relationships between family members. The phenomenon of fatherlessness itself, where there is no father figure in family life, of course, conflicts with the important role of fathers in the social structure, as head of the household, protector, and main breadwinner. This research aims to analyze the implications of society's stigma against fatherless families in communicating within the family as well as how this affects the dynamics of relationships between family members and identify how fatherless family members adjust to the absence of a father in the patriarchal culture that dominates society. In this research, researchers used qualitative methods with a phenomenological approach. Data collection techniques were carried out through interviews and in-depth observation. The results shown in this research show that society's negative stigma towards fatherless families in Lamongan has a significant impact on communication within these families. Findings show that in fatherless families, cohesion is at a detached level with family members being very independent, resulting in a lack of sense of belonging and loyalty. Mothers from fatherless families often take on multiple roles, which creates an imbalance within the family. Meanwhile, the father is seen as a passive figure and does not care much about the family

References

Abdussamad, Z. (2021). METODE PENELITIAN KUALITATIF (Vol. 21, Issue 1). CV. Syakir Media Press. http://journal.um-surabaya.ac.id/index.php/JKM/article/view/2203

Asy’ari, H., & Ariyanto, A. (2019). Gambaran keterlibatan ayah dalam pengasuhan anak (Paternal Involvement) di jobodetabek. Jurnal Psikologi Ilmiah, 37-44.

Clara, E., & Wardani, A. A. (2020). Sosiologi Keluaraga. Jakarta Timur: UNJ Press.

Creswell, J. W. (2015). penelitian kualitatif & desain riset. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Belajar.

Dhea, H. S., Dyorita, A., Universitas, K., & Yogyakarta, A. (2024). Pada wanita yang diasuh oleh ibu tunggal. 6(1), 73–91.

Eadie, W. F. (2009). Century Communication: A Reference Book. California: SAGE Publications.

Fitria, Olivia, H., & Nurvarindra, M. A. (2022). Peran Istri di Pandang dari 3M dalam Budaya Patriarki Suku Jawa. Equalita, 4(2), 168–175. http://www.syekhnurjati.ac.id/jurnal/index.php/ijas/index/12142%0ADiterbitkan

Fitzpatrick, M. A. (2005). Family communication schemata: Effects on children's resiliency. In S. Dunwoody, L. B. Becker, D, McLeod, & G. Kosicki. (Eds), The evolution of key mass communication concepts: Honoring Jack M. McLeod. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.

Galvin, M. K. (2015). Family Communication Cohesion and Change. Routledge.

Herdajani, S. &. (2013). Dampak Fatherless Terhadap Perkembangan Psikologi Anak . Porsiding Seminar Nasional Parenting, 256-271.

Hermawati, T. (2007). Budaya Jawa dan Kesetaraan Gender. Jurnal Komunikasi Massa, 1(1), 18–24.

Huriani, Y. R. (2021). Developing Gender-Based Justice Relationships in Indonesian. Jurnal Studi Gender Dan Anak, 76–95.

Irma, A., & Hasanah, D. (2014). Menyoroti Budaya Patriarki di Indonesia. Social Work, 7(1), 71–80.

Japarianto, E. (2006). Analisis Pembentukan Disonansi Kognitif Konsumen Pemilik Mobil Toyota Avanza. Jurnal Manajemen Pemasaran, Vol 1, No. 2,.

Karkono, K. M. (2020). Budaya Patriarki dalam Film Kartini (2017) Karya Hanung Bramantyo. Kawruh: Journal of Language Education, Literature and Local Culture, 2(1).

Kusnanto, H. (2023). Penelitian kualitatif adalah suatu metode penelitian yang memanfaatkan teknik-teknik pengumpulan data dan analisis yang berbeda dengan penelitian kuantitatif. Tradisi utama dalam penelitian kualitatif mencakup etnografi, riset grounded theory, dan fenomen. Gadjah Mada University Press.

Khatkhate, D., Economic, S., Weekly, P., Nov, N., & Khalkhate, D. (2016). Family in Distress Published by : Economic and Political Weekly Family in Distress. 27(48), 2575–2576.

Lestari, S. (2016). Psikologi Keluarga. Jakarta: Kencana.

Marco‐Gracia, F. J. (2021). “like father, like son”: the importance of fathers in nineteenth- and twentieth-century rural Spain. Journal of Family History, 483-501.

Mackenzie, N. & Knipe, S. (2006). Research dilemmas: Paradigms, methods, and methodology.” Issues In Educational Research.

Mekarisce, A. A. (2020). Teknik Pemeriksaan Keabsahan Data pada Penelitian Kualitatif di Bidang Kesehatan Masyarakat. JURNAL ILMIAH KESEHATAN MASYARAKAT : Media Komunikasi Komunitas Kesehatan Masyarakat, 12(3), 145–151.

https://doi.org/10.52022/jikm.v12i3.102

Moleong, L. J. (2004). Metodologi Penelitian Pendidikan Kualitatif. PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Munjiat, S. M. (2017). Pengaruh Fatherless Terhadap Karakter Anak Dalam Perspektif Islam. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam , 2.

Nomaguchi, K., & Milkie, M. (2020). Parenthood and well‐being: A decade in review. Journal of Marriage and Family, 82(1), 198–223.

Nurhayani. (2020). Eksistensi peran ayah dalam menyiapkan generasi muslim yang shaleh. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Keislaman, 1-19. .

Oktaviana, C. I., & Santosa, H. P. (2018). Pola Komunikasi Pengasuhan Ibu Single Parent. Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 6(3), 1–9. https://ejournal3.undip.ac.id/index.php/interaksi-online/article/view/20983

Olson, D. H. (1981). Family typologies: Bridging family research and family therapy. In E. E. Filsinger & R. A. Levis (Eds.), Assessing marriage: New behavioral approaches. Beverly Hills: CA: Sage.

Raharjo. (1995). Gender dan Pembangunan. jakarta: Puslitbang Kependudukan.

Rodney, H. E., & Mupier, R. (1999). Behavioral differences between African American male adolescents with biological fathers and those without biological fathers in the home. Journal of Black Studies, 30(1), 45–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/002193479903000103

Robbins, S. P. (2022). Perilaku Organisasi. Edisi Sembilan. PT. Indeks Kelompok Gramedia.

Sugiyono. (2017). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta. Alfabeta.

Syarefa, A., & Bakhitah, L. R. (2024). ADAPTASI : Jurnal Sosial Humaniora Dan Keagamaan. Adaptasi : Jurnal Sosial Humaniora Dan Keagamaan, 1(1), 67–87.

Sugiarto, T. S., & Fida, I. A. (2022). Upaya Perempuan Single Parent Dalam Mewujudkan Fungsi Keluarga Bagi Anak (Studi Kasus Di Kelurahan Jati, Kecamatan Mayangan, Kota Probolinggo). SANGAJI: Jurnal Pemikiran Syariah Dan Hukum, 6(2), 61–74. https://doi.org/10.52266/sangaji.v6i2.1249

Tubbs, S. L. (2005). Human Comunication: Prinsip-prinsip Dasar. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Weber, S. (2020). The necessity of intergenerational dialogue on social justice within the South African church. Powers, Inequalities, and Vulnerabilities: Impact of Globalisation on Children, Youth, and Families and the Mission of the Chu. 267-292.

Wibiharto, B., Setiadi, R., & Widyaningsih, Y. (2021). Relationship pattern of fatherless impacts internet addiction, the tendency to suicide, and learning difficulties for students at an abc Jakarta. Society, 264-276.

Wood, J. T. (2016). Interpersonal Communication: Everyday Encounter. Canada: Cengage Learning.