ChatGPT: a New Tool to Improve Teaching and Evaluation of Second and Foreign Languages a Review of ChatGPT: the Future of Education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59890/ijarss.v1i2.392Keywords:
Education Models, Language Reproduction, Instruction in Second Languages, Educational Environments, Customized Instruction, Formative EvaluationAbstract
Concerns about the future of education have been amplified in recent years as a result of the introduction of the innovative online application ChatGPT. Because they depend so much on written assessments, teachers of foreign languages experienced increased levels of worry, which were further made worse by the extensive publicity the topic received in the media.The current topic is centered on the significant debate that has taken place regarding the highly idealized capabilities of the chatbot. Therefore, the first thing that is going to be done in this article is to provide a complete explanation of the mechanics, functions, and common misconceptions about ChatGPT. This review paper aims to focus on positives and negatives that are associated with the employment of chatbots are the first topic that is investigated in this research. After that, a thorough investigation into the ways in which students and teachers may most efficiently make use of the chatbot is carried out. Some people believe that ChatGPT offers substantial opportunities for teachers and educational institutions to improve the ways in which they teach and evaluate second and foreign languages. In addition to this, it has provided academics with a number of new research paths to investigate, most notably in the field of customized education.
References
REFERENCE
Adesso, G. (2023). Towards The Ultimate Brain: Exploring Scientific Discovery with ChatGPT AI, Authorea Preprints. https:// doi.org/10.22541/au.167701309.98216987/v1
Alhumaid, K. (2019). Four ways technology has negatively changed education. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 9(4), 10. https://www.mcser.org/journal/index.php/jesr/article/view/10526
Amit, S., Karim, R., & Kafy, A. A. (2022). Mapping emerging massive open online course (MOOC) markets before and after COVID 19: A comparative perspective from Bangladesh and India. Spatial Information Research, 30(5), 655-663. https:// doi.org/10.1007/s41324-022-00463-4
Bettiol, S., Psereckis, R., & MacIntyre, K. (2022). A perspective of massive open online courses (MOOCs) and public health. Frontiers in Public Health, 10, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.1058383
Bunk, J., Li, R., Smidt, E., Bidetti, C., & Malize, B. (2015). Understanding Faculty Attitudes About Distance Education: The Importance of Excitement and Fear. Online Learning, 19(4), n4. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1079611
Business Insider. (2023, Feb 20). ChatGPT creator Sam Altman says the world may not be “that far away from potentially scary” AI and feels “regulation will be critical.” https://www.businessinsider.com/openai-chatgpt-sam-altman-world-notfar-potentially-scary-ai-2023-2
Carr, N. (2008). Is Google making us stupid?. Teachers College Record, 110(14), 89-94. http://www.theatlantic.com/ doc/200807/google
Chia, O. (2023, January 6). Teachers v ChatGPT: Schools face new challenge in fight against plagiarism. The Straits Times, https://www.straitstimes.com/tech/teachers-v-chatgpt-schools-face-new-challenge-in-fight-against-plagiarism
Chilingaryan, K., & Zvereva, E. (2017). Methodology of flipped classroom as a learning technology in foreign language teaching. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 237, 1500-1504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2017.02.236
Christensen, C. M. (2011). The innovator's dilemma: When new technologies cause great firms to fail. Harvard Business Review Press.
Dixson, D. D., & Worrell, F. C. (2016). Formative and summative assessment in the classroom. Theory into practice, 55(2), 153-159. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2016.1148989
Ferster, B. (2014). Teaching machines: Learning from the intersection of education and technology. Johns Hopkins University Press.
Graham, F. (2022). Daily briefing: Will ChatGPT kill the essay assignment?. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-022- 04437-2
Grant, N. and Metz, C. (2022, December 21). A new chat bot is a ‘code red’ for Google’s search business. New York Times, https://www.nytimes.com/2022/12/21/technology/ai-chatgpt-google-search.html
Hong, W. C. H. (2015). Collocations and Word Combinations in Writing: Challenges of and Suggestions for Teaching and Learning. In E. Doman (Ed.), Reframing English Education in Asia (pp. 63-74). Salt Lake City, MI: American Academic Press.
Hong, W. C. H. (2016). Assessing Explicit Phonological Knowledge—Preliminary Evidence and Implications. In E. Doman (Ed.), Departing from Tradition: Innovations in English Language Teaching (pp. 208-223). Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Hong, W. C. H. (2018). The Effect of Absence of Explicit Knowledge on ESL/EFL Stress-Placement Accuracy: A quasiexperiment. Asian EFL Journal, 20(2), 262-279. https://www.asian-efl-journal.com/wp-content/uploads/AEFLJ-Volume20-Issue-2-2018.pdf#page=262
Hong, W. C. H. (2021a). Improving English as a foreign language learners’ writing using a minimal grammar approach of teaching dependent clauses: A case study of Macao secondary school students. In B. Reynolds & M. Teng (Ed.), Innovative Approaches in Teaching English Writing to Chinese Speakers (pp. 67-90). Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501512643-004
Hong, W. C. H. (2021b). Macao Secondary School EFL Teachers’ Perspectives on Written Corrective Feedback: Rationales and Constraints. Journal of Educational Technology and Innovation, 1(04), 1-13. https://jeti.thewsu.org/index.php/cieti/ article/view/17
Impey, C., & Formanek, M. (2021). MOOCS and 100 Days of COVID: Enrollment surges in massive open online astronomy classes during the coronavirus pandemic. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 4(1), 100177. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.ssaho.2021.100177
Kahn, P. H., Jr. (2011). Technological nature: Adaptation and the future of human life. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Karlin, B. (2013). Technology and Psychology-Natural enemies or just plain natural. Ecopsychology, 5(4), 217-218. https:// doi.org/10.1089/eco.2013.0081
Kaufman, J. A., & McNay, G. D. (2017). At the intersection of technology and nature: The potential for a bright green future. Ecopsychology, 9(4), 253-259. https://doi.org/10.1089/eco.2017.0022
Kim, K. J. (2022). Moving forward: embracing challenges as opportunities to improve medical education in the post-COVID era. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 9(1), 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-022-01451-7
King, M. R., & ChatGPT. (2023). A conversation on artificial intelligence, chatbots, and plagiarism in higher education. Cellular and Molecular Bioengineering, 16, 1-2. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12195-022-00754-8
Krashen, S. (1985). The Input Hypothesis Issues and Implications. London: Longman.
Lage, M. J., Platt, G. J., & Treglia, M. (2000). Inverting the classroom: A gateway to creating an inclusive learning environment. The journal of economic education, 31(1), 30-43.
Le, V. T., Nguyen, N. H., Tran, T. L. N., Nguyen, T. L., Nguyen, A. T., & Nguyen, M. T. (2022). The interaction patterns of pandemic-initiated online teaching: how teachers adapted. System, 105, 102755. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.system.2022.102755
Lee, C., Panda, P., Srinivasan, G., & Roy, K. (2018). Training deep spiking convolutional neural networks with STDP-based unsupervised pre-training followed by supervised fine-tuning. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 12, 435. https://doi.org/10.3389/ fnins.2018.00435
MacNeil, S., Tran, A., Mogil, D., Bernstein, S., Ross, E., & Huang, Z. (2022, August). Generating diverse code explanations using the gpt-3 large language model. In Proceedings of the 2022 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research-Volume 2 (pp. 37-39). https://doi.org/10.1145/3501709.3544280
McNaught, C. (1995, December). Overcoming fear of the unknown! Staff development issues for promoting the use of computers in learning in tertiary education. In Learning with technology. Proceedings of the 12th annual Australian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education ‘95 conference. University of Melbourne (pp. 4-6).
Meishar-Tal, H. (2015). Teachers' use of Wikipedia with their Students. Australian Journal of Teacher Education (Online), 40(12), 126-140. https://search.informit.org/doi/10.3316/ielapa.680983330989166
Molly. (2022, December 13). ChatGPT and the English Classroom: What Teachers Need to Know about AI-generated Essays. Hopefully Home. http://hopefullyhome.com/chatgpt-and-the-english-classroom-what-teachers-need-to-know-about-aigenerated-essays/#worried
Muskat, E. (2023, January 7). Students Caught Cheating Using AI on Final; Academic Integrity Policy Updated - The Commentator. The Commentator. https://yucommentator.org/2023/01/students-caught-cheating-using-ai-on-finalacademic-integrity-policy-updated/
Ohio University. (2023). ChatGPT and Teaching and Learning. https://www.ohio.edu/center-teaching-learning/resources/ chatgpt
Pavlik, J.V. (2023). Collaborating with ChatGPT: considering the implications of generative artificial intelligence for journalism and media education. Journalism & Mass Communication Educator, 78(1), 84–93. https://doi. org/10.1177/10776958221149577
Peritz, A. (2022, September 6). A Fun, Easy New Way for Students to Cheat. Slate Magazine. https://slate.com/ technology/2022/09/ai-students-writing-cheating-sudowrite.html
Radford, A., Narasimhan, K., Salimans, T., & Sutskever, I. (2018). Improving language understanding by generative pretraining. http://www.cs.ubc.ca/amuham01/LING530/papers/radford2018improving.pdf
Reuters. (2023, January 27). Top French university bans use of ChatGPT to prevent plagiarism. https://www.reuters.com/ technology/top-french-university-bans-use-chatgpt-prevent-plagiarism-2023-01-27/
Rudolph, J. (2014). Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) as a disruptive innovation in higher education? [M.Ed. dissertation, University of Adelaide].
Rudolph, J., Tan, S., & Tan, S. (2023). ChatGPT: Bullshit spewer or the end of traditional assessments in higher education?. Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.9
Skehan, P. (2013). Language aptitude. In M. Bigelow & Watson, J. (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition, pp. 399-413. Routledge.
Sravat, N., & Pathranarakul, P. (2022). Flipped learning pedagogy: modelling the challenges for higher education in India. International Journal of Learning and Change, 14(2), 221-240. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJLC.2022.121137
Strain-Moritz, T. (2016). Perceptions of Technology Use and Its Effects on Student Writing. (Master's Thesis). https:// digitalcommons.brockport.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=https://www.google.com.eg/&httpsredir=1&article=1399&co ntext=ehd_theses
TESOL International association. (2023). AI for Language Learning: ChatGPT and the Future of ELT. http://blog.tesol.org/aifor-language-learning-chatgpt-and-the-future-of-elt/
Thorp, H. H. (2023). ChatGPT is fun, but not an author. Science, 379(6630), 313-313. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/ science.adg7879
Turan, Z., & Akdag-Cimen, B. (2020). Flipped classroom in English language teaching: a systematic review. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 33(5-6), 590-606. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1584117
Verma, P., & Diamantidis, S. (2021). What is Reinforcement Learning? Synopsys. https://www.synopsys.com/ai/what-isreinforcement-learning.html
Xu, X., Hong W. C. H., Zhang, Y., Jiang, H., & Liu, J. (2023). Learning Paths design in Personal Learning Environments: the Impact on Postgraduates’ Cognitive Achievements and Satisfaction. Innovations in Education and Teaching International. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2189603
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 zanyar ghafar
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
