Public Perception of the Effectiveness of Public Administration Reforms in Bangladesh
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59890/ijarss.v1i2.549Keywords:
Public Administration, Bangladesh Reform, Effectiveness of Public AdministrationAbstract
The Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) represent a comprehensive blueprint for global endeavors to address socio-economic and environmental challenges by 2030. This study delves into the intricate tapestry of SDG implementation within the public administrative realm of Bangladesh. By amalgamating quantitative data, qualitative insights, and comprehensive analyses, the research uncovers the commendable progress made, the innovative strategies employed, and the multifaceted challenges encountered. From the integration of SDGs into national agendas to the pioneering SDG tracker, Bangladesh's commitment is evident. However, bureaucratic constraints, resource limitations, and practical applicability of initiatives emerge as areas requiring nuanced interventions. As Bangladesh charts its path towards 2030, this research underscores the importance of continuous adaptation, collaboration, and a unified vision. This study not only elucidates Bangladesh's SDG journey but also contributes to the global narrative of sustainable development aspirations.
References
Hossain, S. M. The Trust Factor in the Ganges Delta: Understanding Bangladeshi Perceptions of Accountability in Public Finance.
Rahman, M. M. (2021). Achieving Sustainable Development Goals of Agenda 2030 in Bangladesh: the crossroad of the governance and performance. Public Administration and Policy, 24(2), 195-211.
Khatun, F., Bhattacharya, D., Rahman, M., Moazzem, K. G., Khan, T. I., Sabbih, M. A., & Saadat, S. Y. (2020). Four years of SDGs in Bangladesh: Measuring progress and charting the path forward. Centre for Policy Dialogue.
Bebbington, J., & Unerman, J. (2020). Advancing research into accounting and the UN sustainable development goals. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 33(7), 1657-1670.
Carnes, M. E. (2014). Continuity despite change: The politics of labor regulation in Latin America. Stanford University Press.
Crawford, J. K. (2010). The strategic project office. CRC Press.
Kohli, A. (2004). State-directed development: political power and industrialization in the global periphery. Cambridge university press.
McKinnon, M. C., Orthia, L. A., Grant, W. J., & Lamberts, R. (2014). Real-world assessment as an integral component of an undergraduate science communication program. International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education, 22(5).
World Health Organization. (2015). Health in 2015: from MDGs, millennium development goals to SDGs, sustainable development goals.
Islam, M. S. (2018). New public management-based reform in Bangladesh: a review of public administration reform commission. Indian Journal of Public Administration, 64(1), 15-35.
Meuleman, L. (2021). Public administration and governance for the SDGs: Navigating between change and stability. Sustainability, 13(11), 5914.
Elias Sarker, A. (2006). New public management in developing countries: An analysis of success and failure with particular reference to Singapore and Bangladesh. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 19(2), 180-203.
Broadbent, J., & Guthrie, J. (1992). Changes in the Public Sector: A Review of Recent''Alternative''Accounting Research. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 5(2), 0-0.
Zafarullah, H., & Huque, A. S. (2001). Public management for good governance: Reforms, regimes, and reality in Bangladesh. International Journal of Public Administration, 24(12), 1379-1403.
Armstrong, E. (2005). Integrity, transparency and accountability in public administration: Recent trends, regional and international developments and emerging issues. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, 1(10), 1-10.
Sabharwal, M., & Berman, E. M. (Eds.). (2013). Public administration in South Asia: India, Bangladesh, and Pakistan. CRC Press.
Huque, A. S., & Ferdous, J. (2019). Bureaucratic and political leadership in Bangladesh: dynamics of administrative reform and the public interest. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, 41(3), 169-180.
Bangura, Y. (2000). Public sector restructuring: the institutional and social effects of fiscal, managerial and capacity-building reforms (No. 3). Geneva 2000 Occasional Paper.
Ihuah, P. W., & Eaton, D. (2013). The pragmatic research approach: A framework for sustainable management of public housing estates in Nigeria. Journal of US-China Public Administration, 10(10), 933-944.
Sarkar, M. S. K., Okitasari, M., Ahsan, M. R., & Al-Amin, A. Q. (2022). Localisation of sustainable development goals (SDGs) in Bangladesh: An inclusive framework under local governments. Sustainability, 14(17), 10817.
Scott, W., & Gough, S. (Eds.). (2004). Key issues in sustainable development and learning: A critical review.
S. S, Mainuddin M., Sarder A. R. "Bridging the divide: TVET’S transformative role in youth unemployment and skill development in Bangladesh". International Journal of Multidisciplinary Education and Research, Volume 8, Issue 3, 2023, Pages 48-54.
Sarder, S., Mainuddin, M. D., & Sarder, A. R. Assessment of the Current State and Future Prospects of Online Learning in Bangladesh’s Education System.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Ariful Islam Siddique, Md Mainuddin
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
