Catalyzing Collaboration: Reacting to Change Through Collaborative Teacher Professional Development for Transformative Science Education in Nigeria

Authors

  • Usman Rufai Fakai Department of Chemistry Education, Adamu Augie College of Education Argungu
  • Aliyu Sa’adu Adamu Augie College of Education Argungu
  • Muhammad Abdullahi Argungu Adamu Augie College of Education Argungu
  • Abubakar Sahabi Aliyu Adamu Augie College of Education Argungu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59890/ijels.v2i9.2329

Keywords:

Science Education, Teacher Collaboration, Transformative Learning, Collaborative Professional Development

Abstract

This study investigates the impact of collaborative professional development (CPD) on science education in Nigeria, utilizing a mixed-methods research design. Through a combination of qualitative interviews, focus groups, and classroom observations, alongside quantitative surveys and academic performance data, the study explores how CPD influences teaching practices and student outcomes. Quantitative data showed a statistically significant improvement in student science test scores post-CPD implementation. However, challenges such as resource constraints, time limitations, and insufficient administrative support were identified as barriers to effective CPD implementation. The study highlights the importance of fostering a collaborative culture in schools, providing adequate resources, and ensuring continuous professional growth through structured and supportive policies. These findings underscore the need for educational policymakers to prioritize CPD, integrating it into teacher evaluation and career progression frameworks to achieve sustainable improvements in science education.

Author Biography

Usman Rufai Fakai, Department of Chemistry Education, Adamu Augie College of Education Argungu

 

 

References

• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

• Brookfield, S. D. (2000). Transformative learning as ideology critique. In J. Mezirow & Associates (Eds.), Learning as transformation: Critical perspectives on a theory in progress (pp. 125-148). Jossey-Bass.

• Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

• Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

• Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective teacher professional development. Learning Policy Institute.

• Denzin, N. K. (2017). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods. Routledge.

• Desimone, L. M. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher, 38(3), 181-199. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X08331140

• Ezeudu, F. O. (2013). The role of teachers' professional development in educational transformation in Nigeria. International Journal of Education and Research, 1(7), 1-14. Retrieved from http://www.ijern.com/journal/July-2013/18.pdf

• Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

• Greene, J. C., Caracelli, V. J., & Graham, W. F. (1989). Toward a conceptual framework for mixed-method evaluation designs. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 11(3), 255-274. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737011003255

• Hord, S. M. (1997). Professional learning communities: Communities of continuous inquiry and improvement. Southwest Educational Development Laboratory.

• Jegede, O. J. (1995). Collateral learning and the eco-cultural paradigm in science and mathematics education in Africa. Studies in Science Education, 25(1), 97-137. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057269508560051

• Johnson, R. B., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Turner, L. A. (2007). Toward a definition of mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(2), 112-133. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689806298224

• Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice Hall.

• Krueger, R. A., & Casey, M. A. (2014). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.

• Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2009). Interviews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.

• Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press.

• Mezirow, J. (1997). Transformative learning: Theory to practice. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 1997(74), 5-12. https://doi.org/10.1002/ace.7401

• Ogunmade, T. O. (2005). The status and quality of secondary science teaching and learning in Lagos State, Nigeria. University of Melbourne. Retrieved from https://minerva-access.unimelb.edu.au/bitstream/handle/11343/39522/65812_00000290_01_ogunmade.pdf

• Pallant, J. (2016). SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using IBM SPSS (6th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.

• Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (2010). Sage handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.

• Vescio, V., Ross, D., & Adams, A. (2008). A review of research on the impact of professional learning communities on teaching practice and student learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(1), 80-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2007.01.004

• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

Downloads

Published

2024-09-28

How to Cite

Usman Rufai Fakai, Aliyu Sa’adu, Muhammad Abdullahi Argungu, & Abubakar Sahabi Aliyu. (2024). Catalyzing Collaboration: Reacting to Change Through Collaborative Teacher Professional Development for Transformative Science Education in Nigeria. International Journal of Educational and Life Sciences, 2(9), 1133–1164. https://doi.org/10.59890/ijels.v2i9.2329